Index

Endowment Effect

The tendency to value an item more highly simply because you own it, regardless of its objective market value.

The endowment effect makes people demand more to give up something they possess than they would pay to acquire it, distorting trade-offs and negotiations.

If I didn't already have this, would I buy or build it at the price I'm implicitly putting on it?

A team resists replacing a homegrown internal tool with a better SaaS product because the tool is theirs, even though the replacement would save hundreds of engineering hours.

  1. 1.Evaluate assets by what you would pay to acquire them today, not by what you invested.
  2. 2.Use outside perspectives to appraise owned assets objectively.
  3. 3.Set periodic reviews where continuation must be re-justified from scratch.
  • ·Selling or discarding things too easily in an attempt to avoid the bias.
  • ·Ignoring legitimate switching costs when evaluating replacements.
  • ·Conflating emotional attachment with strategic value.

How does the endowment effect appear in negotiations?

Sellers consistently price items higher than buyers will pay, creating gaps that stall deals unless one side adjusts.

Is the endowment effect related to sunk cost fallacy?

They are related. The endowment effect inflates perceived value of owned assets; sunk cost fallacy keeps you investing in them because of past spend.